Acrylamide is in Chocolate!

The media often tells us that dark chocolate is “healthier” than milk chocolate because of its high antioxidant content. Yes, this is true: dark chocolate contains more than four times the amount of antioxidants than milk chocolate (~200 Units/gram vs. ~45 Units/gram; Miller et al. 2006):

choco aos

However, as shown below, what they neglect to tell us is that cocoa powder beats both dark and milk chocolate, with ~800 antioxidant Units/gram! That translates into 4-fold more antioxidants than dark chocolate, and approximately 18-fold more antioxidants than milk chocolate! So, make your own chocolate at home, with cocoa powder, right?

Maybe not. To make cocoa powder, cacao beans are first roasted at a high temperature. Roasted cocoa beans are processed to remove its cocoa butter, leaving behind the cocoa solids which are then ground, forming cocoa powder. One could argue that the remaining cocoa powder, when used in chocolate is better for health than using raw (non-roasted), ground cacao beans because cocoa powder has less saturated and total fat. Although this is true, roasting the cocoa bean (or any grain, nut, or seed) produces acrylamide, a compound that has been shown to be both neurotoxic and carcinogenic (Burek et al. 1980; Johnson et al. 1986; Friedman et al. 1995). Raw cacao beans, because they have not been roasted, do not contain acrylamide.

How much acrylamide is in a Hershey’s dark chocolate bar? One 43 gram bar contains approximately 30 grams of cocoa powder (70% cocoa solids). Hershey’s cocoa powder contains 909 µg/kg of acrylamide, and when multiplied by 0.03 kg (30 grams), this yields 27.3 µg total acrylamide. The lowest risk for dietary acrylamide-induced toxicity has been recommended to be less than 1.5µg/kg body weight/day (Shipp et al. 2006). This value translates into 75 µg/day for a 50 kg woman, or 112.5 µg/day for a 75 kg man. So, if you eat one Hershey’s dark chocolate bar, you will have ingested a significant amount towards the 75 or 112.5 µg/day upper limit. It’s important to note that there is indeed difference in acrylamide content when comparing Hershey’s and Ghiradelli cocoa powder: Hershey’s contains 3-fold more acrylamide than Ghiradelli (909 µg/kg vs. 316 µg/kg). Therefore, to minimize acrylamide-related risk, if you’re making your own chocolate at home the best thing to do would be to grind your own raw cacao beans, as I do (https://michaellustgarten.wordpress.com/2014/09/21/homemade-chocolate-in-2-minutes/).

Another food that is thought of as “healthy” are baked potato chips, but they’re not healthy in terms of acrylamide content! Baked! Lay’s Original Naturally Baked Potato Crisps have 31 µg of acrylamide per 1 ounce bag. Listed below are other notable sources of dietary acrylamide, including one unhealthy (Pringles), and others commonly thought to be “healthy”.

1 oz. (16 crisps), Pringles Sweet Mesquite BBQ Flavored Potato Crisps: 70 µg of acrylamide

1 oz. (6 crackers), Health Valley Original Oat Bran Graham Crackers: 43 µg of acrylamide

1 serving (2 oz.), Nature’s Path Organic Optimum Power Breakfast, Flax, Soy, Blueberry: 22 µg of acrylamide

1 oz., Blue Diamond Roasted Salted Almonds: 6.7 µg of acrylamide

2 slices, Arnold Bakery Light 100% Whole Wheat Bread: 5.7 µg of acrylamide

If you’re interested, please have a look at my book!

References:

Acrylamide list: http://www.fda.gov/food/foodborneillnesscontaminants/chemicalcontaminants/ucm053549.htm

Burek JD, Albee RR, Beyer JE, Bell TJ, Carreon RM, Morden DC, Wade CE, Hermann EA, Gorzinski SJ, 1980. Subchronic toxicity of acrylamide administered to rats in the drinking water followed by up to 144 days of recovery. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. 4,157-182.

Friedman MA, Dulak LH, Stedham MA, 1995. A lifetime oncogenicity study in rats with acrylamide. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 27, 95-105.

Johnson KA, Gorzinski SJ, Bodner KM, Campbell RA, Wolf CH, Friedman MA, Mast RW, 1986. Chronic toxicity and oncogenicity study on acrylamide incorporated in the drinking water of Fischer 344 rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 85, 154-168.

Miller KB, Stuart DA, Smith NL, Lee CY, McHale NL, Flanagan JA, Ou B, Hurst WJ, 2006. Antioxidant activity and polyphenol and procyanidin contents of selected commercially available cocoa-containing and chocolate products in the United States. J Agric Food Chem. 31;54(11), 4062-8.

Shipp A, Lawrence G, Gentry R, McDonald T, Bartow H, Bounds J, Macdonald N, Clewell H, Allen B, Van Landingham C, 2006. Acrylamide: review of toxicity data and dose-response analyses for cancer and noncancer effects. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 36, 481-608.

12 thoughts on “Acrylamide is in Chocolate!

  1. Pingback: Kuna Cocoa: The Optimal Way to Decrease Blood Pressure, and, to Reduce Risk of Heart Disease and Cancer? | Michael Lustgarten

  2. Chloe

    Thanks for this post Michael. I’d love to know your thoughts on the cadmium and lead that’s supposed to occur naturally in cacao beans…is it as dangerous as some bloggers make it out to be? Do you still eat cacao?

    Like

    Reply
    1. Michael Lustgarten Post author

      Hey Chloe, I do still eat cacao, about 1x/week. My blood tests look good (see my post on biological age), so I’m confident that whatever levels of cadmium and lead that you’re worried about are minimized for me.

      Like

      Reply
      1. Chloe Sondheim

        OK – thanks! I’m sure you’ll post an update if you come across some new info in the future! Thanks for all of this great info!

        Like

  3. Pingback: Spotlight on cacao - Wild and Alive

  4. Dennis Fink

    Hi Mike! I see you have Rejuvant adds which I ordered last week. Does the add mean you like their product or do you not have a say in the adds? I ordered the monthly choice w/ the DNAge tests so am anxious to see results and hoping they won’t be slanted to make the AKG/retinyl palmitate look better after 3 months of use.

    Like

    Reply
  5. Dennis Fink

    I know you aren’t big on supplements but at 75 I feel forced to try them and I don’t spend much on other things so I can afford to try them, hoping I find some good ones. The Rejuvant claims look pretty good even though the life extension/compressed morbidity is only in animals so far I guess and I love the idea of including the DNAge tests with it, assuming it’s not a sales gimmick. Writing it down makes me realize I should either do some blood tests to corroborate any biological age that a Rejuvant partnership shows or have a separate Horvath type test done. Do you have any opinion on the AKG (alpha keto-glutarate) that is part of the Krebs cycle that is the primary ingredient in their supplement? They cite the Buck Institute as having done the mouse research w/ their supplement so that seems pretty impressive, right? I need a second more expert opinion before recommending it to anyone else.

    Like

    Reply
    1. Michael Lustgarten Post author

      aKG, Rejuvant, or other supplements-how do they affect your biological age? that’s more important than my opinion, Dennis.

      Like

      Reply

Leave a Reply